Case Study of Architect Laurence Loh

THEORIES OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISMBehind of all timey good excogitationer lies beds upon beds of swipe idea, critical thought and tendency devising in which regularizes his architectural sentiments and determinations that express is axiomatic, that one can chew over and be intrigued by the impressions of what lies beyond those beds of ideas, the concluding behind ground. In other words, do we non totally experience both internal and impertinent trances in our lives that cast and determine our worldview which in bend influences the manner we wish to deal with the universe? That I think could be said for anyone, including designers and how lifes experiences determine their devising of architecture. The Hagiographas in this essay intent to neither self-praise nor knock some an designer and their constructions, but instead to speculate or propose received thoughts ab divulge an architects reservation of architecture. More specifically, what is analyzed and discussed in the essay are what are termed internal and external influences on an designers design, that is the ego of the designer which includes the architects childhood, instruction and working experiences, and other external lending factors such as clime, theoretical discourses of architecture, clients, political relations, etc. through and through the survey and review of these factors could we undercover or detect an implicit in subject, form or impression in the architects yeasty activity of architecture.The designer to be analysed in this essay is the well-respected Ar Laurence Loh. natural in Penang in the 1950s, Ar Laurence is known worldwide of one of the taking innovators in architectural preservation and saving of heritage. Graduate of the at any rate world-famous architectural Association in London, Ar Laurence is most celebrated for the Restoration of the Cheong Fatt Tze mansion house in Penang. A member of assorted societies and public capacities for architectural herit age and preservation, Ar Laurence besides presently runs a designing in Penang registered as LLA Arkitek Sdn Bhd which engages in both preservation and raw-day plants. The undertaking to be discussed hither is the red-brick promontory of reference to the historic Penang Hill Lower Station at Air Itam.Ar Laurence was engaged to plan an extension to the historical compound edifice of the start out train station which serves as the chief access point to the popular and historically of import countries of Penang Hill, which was established as a colonial hill station by the British decennaries ago. What resulted was a modern spin of steel and cloth which replaced the grizzly frontage of doric columns and arches. The cardinal images below show the drastic rewrite in character and common sense of topographic point in the fit and after the modern extension was finished. sooner the construct of this essay, a thorough and full probe into the internal factors of the ego, as evi scerated in the paragraphs before, was already carried away in the classs of Ar Laurences childhood, instruction and working experience. Therefore, the chief purpose of the subdivision here is to research, describe and analyse the 2nd half of influences that is the external factors on an architects making of architecture. Three separate factors were selected, viz. the reinforced signifier of the undertaking, the influence of clime on the design and eventually guess on architectural theory that could feed informed the development of the extension.Built signifier, in the rendering of this analysis, includes all bing edifices, immature and old, that can be found on situation at the minute. Therefore, as we can read in the analysis diagrams, it is cardinal to indicate out that the historical constructions of colonial architecture were really untold preserved in their original province stuffs, placement of structural elements homogeneous columns, programme of unmeasureds, etc. all seemed to hold been maintained absolutely in topographic point and no via media was accustomed in aftermath of the construction of the extension. Rather, it could be asserted that the extension was designed to concentrate on perseveration of infinites, catering on extra room to infinites that sooner existed in the station, and to besides add on freshly programmatic and experiential infinites to rejuvenate the push button of the lower station, haply to pull a greater figure of tourer and visitants to come to Penang Hill.This could be seen in the infinites that were extended and the infinites that were introduced to the pose. For illustration, the old ticketing counter and waiting room was given a much larger infinite under the tint of the new steel construction, likely to suit a greater sum of nation that were anticipated to see the site. Besides, being the cardinal experiential infinite that drives the new energy of the station is the recreational country with the big volume of infinite as created by the attention-getting retractable canopy roof. The ample shadiness provided by the canopy and monumental sense of graduated table generated when standing(a) under the roof construction helps to spiel forth that new lot that draws concourse to the site, a new character that didnt exist before on site, in blunt contrast to the unlaced infinite typology of the old frontage of the lower station. Materiality in the modern extension besides plays a important portion in the coevals of renewed affaire in the site. The combination of steel and cloth in its construction and corporeality greatly contrasts with the brick and concrete frame construction of the original lower station, making an inherit attention-grabbing factor.Traveling on, we now turn our attending towards the clime factor, and how it has bear on the design of the extension. As mentioned before, the original construction consisted of a big unfastened infinite or garnering country in the C entre that was unfastened to and overt to the elements. It is normally known to all that Malaysia is a tropical clime with numerous yearss of sun exposure and sometimes it could espouse highly hot and the agitate could go intolerable. The big canopy roof construction added provides that much required shadiness from the scorching beams of the Sun and besides from bad conditions. However, other than that, the design doesnt seems to hold much much consideration towards clime, due(p) to the glowering fact as exposed in the analysis diagrams of a deficiency of good cross breathing in the side. Though there is proviso for hot air to get away through the stack airing consequence, there isnt good cross airing through the edifice, due to a deficiency of gaps on both windward and leeward faces. The modern extension does nil to work out this issue it doesnt let for new gaps, nor does it build architectural elements like air current walls to bring predominating zephyrs into the infi nite. Predominating air currents from the nor-easthold a much more difficult cultivate acquiring into the infinite, obstructed by solid concrete walls with really midget gaps for natural airing.Third, in the concluding factor of the three external influences, the architectural theory will be discussed. It mentions about three different architectural discourses, viz. retinal architecture, the acquisitions from Las Vegas, and capitalist economy in architecture. As implied in the mise en scene of the reinforced signifier influence, the architecture of the modern extension has a certain capitalist spirit to it, in that it generates a new energy of topographic point to pull the attending of people to the old site of Penang Hill, conveying in concern and an economic encouragement to the topographic point. At first glimpse, it could be said that the clients have the say in the determination devising of the design phase, and as Michael Sorkin mentioned so truthfully, designers are typica lly bound(p) to the caprices of their clients. Is this so in Ar Laurences instance? If one looked at the instance from the surface, it would be a sensible decision to come to.So far, we have explored some external factors that could hold affected the design of the extension to the lower station of Penang Hill. Some of these logical sentiments may hold implied the impression that Ar Laurence may hold sold out to capital avarice and instead than continue his ain rules of keeping a scruples in architecture, he was to yield to the demands of the client over keeping a prime(prenominal) of architecture that matches his criterions. Others point in the opposite way, demoing the quality of Ar Laurence and what he is known for, that is the saving of heritage, seen in how the extension does non overpower and steep the historical colonial edifice, but to a good grade built in harmoniousness with the site and its milieus. Such contradictions exist in the same design, but could it be that the se contradictions were made consciously? As he has mentioned before, Ar Laurence does non snitch out for the interest of money in his architecture, for he does non see architecture as a agency of going rich. However, if such is true, so why would he hold to planing a modern extension at a historical topographic point that is non merely so out of context for the site, but which is designed with a commercial oculus to it, that is to plan something cheapjack in order to pull more concern? Why non touch on what he does best and continue the original historical construction or reconstruct it to its former glorification alternatively of simply keeping its corporal signifier for the interest of sentimentalism? What does it intend to purposefully belie oneself, and what how does it play out in the populace oculus? What could be the effects of that, particularly since Ar Laurence is an established and respected public figure?Covering with the populace is something Laurence has ever had a aberrant manner of covering with. As with some of his other preservation undertakings, he has mentioned that he conserves non to simply protect the reminiscence of the topographic point and of its history, but in saving comes moving ridges of alteration. Now, he defines waves of change as alteration in idea, alteration in sentiment, alteration in the heads of people in how they perceive and value their heritage and traditional determine. Here once more we see the contradiction that so glaringly purports to inform the design of the extension to the lower station. How can preservation lead to alter? It could be interpreted that Laurence utilizes the modern extension as an magnetic force of the ocular sense to capture attending and draw people to the infinite, due to the suppressing oculus playing the hegemonic function in architectural pattern above all other senses. The extension contrasts and stands out in the originally historical and natural context, emulating the symbolism an d decorated caducous consequence as talked about in Venturis Learning from Las Vegas. This could reply for the logical thinking behind the commerciality of the infinite. Its non that Laurence got muscled out by the client or neglect to his ain greed for money, it is that he utilized looking contradictory patterns to acquire people to see the infinite. This leads us to our following point, in that the topographic point that Ar Laurence is seeking to take people to is one that is strongly cogitate to the spirit of topographic point, the history of Penang.Possibly, in my sentiment, continuing the original construction in the aftermath of a modern extension leaves a revere in people, it creates an internal duologue from which inquiries of chew overing are born, invariably enquire what made the historical construction such an of import consideration to hold been preserved? This relates back to Ar Laurences statement of saving for alteration, in that the creative activity of duologue in the public kingdom brings more attending towards architectural heritage. But in our modern twenty-four hours and age, that is a difficult thing to accomplish. Ar Laurences solution? Insurgent methods of utilizing cheesy architecture to convey focal point to the history and values of topographic point.In the terminal, it is theorized that Ar Laurence, through apparently contradictory and insurgent methods, purposes to bring forth a public sentiment on his attractive and out of context modern extension of the colonial edifices found at the lower station of Penang Hill, in order to convey attending towards the historical values of topographic point. In the terminal nevertheless, what matters is that the extension acts as a tops(predicate)cial method of pulling people to the topographic point the original edifice is still to the full experienced one time the users go past the forepart frontage and initial infinites, pulling more people to see history and their heritage.Reference listArkitek LLA. ( 2008 ) .LLA. 1sterectile dysfunction. Malaya Arkitek LLA Sdn Bhd.ARKITEK LLA. ( 2010 ) . Penang Hill Lower Station new-made Extension. Retrieved 15 June 2014, from hypertext transfer protocol //www.lla.com.my/Davies, C. ( 2011 ) . Thinking About Architecture An launch to architectural theory. City Road, London Laurence King PrintingHong Kong University. ( 2011 ) .Curriculum Vitae Laurence Loh Kwong Yu.Retrieved 23 whitethorn 2014, from hypertext transfer protocol //acp.arch.hku.hk/people/Laurence % 20CV.htmPallasma, J. ( 2005 ) .Eyess of the Skin.Ontario, Canada John Wiley & A Sons.