Does Source B support the evidence of Source C about the Suffrage campaign?

During the early 20th century, Womens battle for par r separatelyed its rattling peak as their footrace to be granted vote became even more passionate and frantic, as. It was around this time that the first genuinely changes started occur and as with any revolutionary crusade, t present was a long deal of controversy surrounding it. It therefore comes as no coarse surprise that an immense amount of media was published concerning the subject. This was created by heap on both(prenominal) sides of the campaign, and so there is a very(prenominal) wide lam of the positions voiced with forms of phonograph recordings, newspaper articles, speeches and in particular propaganda posters.Both these sources state an extremely disdainful view towards womens suffrage, however to what extent they patronize each other in the rest of their views is rather debatable and needs to be considered to a further degree. Although these two sources were written for entirely different purposes, they astonishingly sh atomic number 18 atomic number 53 of their common principles, sending extinct an al approximately undistinguishable message on the actions of Suffragettes. Both authors tactile sensation that they were behaving in a maniac(predicate) manner which was tot every(prenominal)y unacceptable, and one which would only be used by the most preposterous lunatics. spring C depicts a suffragette protesting maniac all in ally, in a very emotional posture with greatly exaggerated and unwomanly actions. The informant immediately feels contempt towards her, seeing her as nothing but a nuisance. This feeling is accordingly enhanced by the label underneath- The Shrieking Sister. This is implying that the suffragette is very mentally unstable, to the extent of hysteria. Also, by Sister it is associating her into an organization, as part of a brethren which we are led to believe are all like this.This immediately lowers all suffragette campaigners, devising their cause wo rthless. Source B is portraying a very similar feeling, labeling the protests as a shrill cry. The word shrill here implies how they are hysterical, irrational and desperate. Its purpose, similar to that of Source Cs is to demote them and demonstrate out how ridiculous their actions are. Another management in which the two sources are linked/similar is in the way they dehumanize women suffrage campaigners. Source B does this simply by the title of the book- Women or Suffragette.This suggests that a woman could only be one or the other, and that should they be a suffragette they are letting go of an femininity. fifty-fifty by just reading the title of the book, the public feel pressure into making a decision between the two sides- between world a respected, charming woman or being an indistinguishable/ indefinable monstrosity. Source C uses similar tactics in putting this point across, apply the label and the drawing of the Suffragette behaving in an animalistic way to shine u p the beastiality and violence of the woman.Text is used to great advantage by both Corelli and Partridge to make their views noticed, and both use fonting techniques to capture the readers attention, Partridge using a larger, bolder, more noticeable font and Corelli simply putting it in italics to stress the importance of that view. This tops in the viewer being able to lay out their main points even at a glance, which increases the liklihood of success of their work. (Success being that people begin to reflect on the situation through the view of the authors).Whilst the Sources whitethorn support each other in their fundamental reasons, they differ kinda a bit in the rest of their views. One of the biggest ways in which their opinions divert is on the whole suffrage campaign. Source B is preferably clearly against the whole cause, as Corelli does not differentiate between Suffragists and Suffragattes whilst she is slandering feminine campaigners, and simply generalizes them together. On the other hand, Source C makes it clear that they wee no issues whatsoever with Suffragists.In the portrait, the Suffragists is represented as calm, mature and is stand up very upright and sensibly. She is making no radical actions, and appears to be intemperately critizing the actions of the Suffragette. In the caption, she is even labelled as the Sensible Woman. This implies that Partridge is by no means against the cause, and that if campaigners be wipe out in appropriate and sensible manners then he is perfectly happy to listen to their cause, and that he is simply refusing to await the violence of Suffragettes.However, this view is not very clearly shown by the poster, and it go away to the viewer to interpret it themselves. In general, Source C is only commenting on the tactics used in the campaign, not the reasoning behind the campaign. Source B is completely different to this, and it is full of critism of Women for demanding suffrage. Corelli clams that Wome n were and are bandaged to make voters rather than to be voters themselves. By the comment, she is stating that she feels that the situation is never red to change, and that women should just stay in the Private Sphere where they are evaluate to be.She feels that women are not capable of voting, and that the injustices they suffer should be stopped through other means. Corelli suggests that the lack of equality it womens own fault, saying that it is a result of the way in which mothers have reared their sons. This is saying that if Women want to change the way in which they are treated in society, they must do it by giving their sons, the generation which will shape the future as they drop dead adults, a more morally intact view of women.Whereas contrary to this belief of it being cod to womens own mistakes that society is so obvlivious to their rights, Source C suggests that it is due to Suffragettes that the campaign is still failing, as is exampled by the Suffragists comment ing that Suffragettes were the causes worst enemy. In conclusion, I feel that Source B does support a great deal of the evidence in Source C- that about the campaigning techniques of Suffragettes however it can vary a great deal in other views and in many ways they even contradict each other, such as with the opinion of who was to blame for the great sexism of the time.In general, I feel that although the views of the two sources are in places identical, this is just a coincidence, as they are for different reasons. This is most likely due to the fact that the original media had different purposes. Source B was from a book which was very clearly anti-womens suffrage. Anyone who would be reading the book would clearly already be leaning towards these views, and Corelli was simply fork uping to incline them more, or share her opinions with them.Partridge was using his poster to appeal to Suffragettes, and to the public, to try and make them realize that violent, militant campaignin g was not helping the cause, and making the whole thing seem just rants of hysterical, moronic women. By performing like animals with shrieking and shrill cries, they bring a bad reputation to all women, and simply give support to the claims that women were emotionally weak. The one thing which they most storngly support each other in is in blaming Suffragettes for the level of disfain the public have towards Womens Suffrage, and it is this solely which links the too.