The Role of Autonomy and Responsibility Held by the Bourgeoisie during

The Role of familiarity and Responsibility Held by the Bourgeoisie during the Industrial transformation During the Industrial Revolution the population was broken up into two classes the minority was the naughty, industrial center field class, the middle class, and the majority was the poor working class, the toil. The bourgeoisie believed in their rights to gain wealth and preserve individuality and in their duty to maintain these rights, which in yield determined the harsh laboring and living conditions of the working class. The indignities forced upon the get down class also caused movements that challenged the bourgeoisie to alter their beliefs. These include the creation of Communism, the Christian Socialist Movement, utopian models, and other theoretic views. The demands for social reforms from these movements along with the demands from the proletariat and other influential members of society, forced the bourgeoisie to modify their views to include righteou s justifications for their actions. Classical economists invented these justifications. They claimed that low wages were necessary to ensure survival, that the proletariat took service of the bourgeosie members, and finally that the proletariat members were responsible for their poor state. The bourgeoisie maintained their rich lifestyle only through their exploitation of the lower class, the proletariat. This exploitation included poor working conditions, child labor, long hours, and low wages. The industrial bourgeoisie established factories in order to produce the most efficient products at the least expensive cost. These factories, especially mines, were extremely dangerous. Three hundred il deaths occurred just in the mines of England in 18... ...4 Rogers 149. 5 Rogers 136. 6 Rogers 146. 7 Rogers 139. 8 Rogers 136. 9 Seed, John. Capital and Class Formation in premature Industrial England Social History v. 18 1993 p. 17-30. 10 Rogers 135. 11 Rogers 144. 12 Rogers 145. Bibliography- Rogers, Perry M. Aspects of Western Civilization Problems and Sources in History Third Edition (Upper appoint NJ Prentice Hall, 1996), 138. - Seed, John. Capital and Class Formation in early(a) Industrial England Social History v.18 1993 p.17-30. This article provided a synopsis of T Koditscheks Class Formation and Urban Industrial Society Bradford 1750-1850. It showed the roles autonomy and certificate of indebtedness played in the industrialists influence of the economic, political, and social spheres during this period and illustrated the class antipathy between capital and labor.